🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin traveled to India in the previous decade, the international order looked entirely distinct. That short trip, limited by the pandemic, centered around discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two nations.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would transform the Russian leader into a global pariah, greatly limiting his overseas engagements.

Additionally, that period preceded a major change in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory statements and the introduction of heavy trade tariffs.

"Against this backdrop, the importance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a symbol of enduring ties and a rejection of outside coercion," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The high-level meeting occurs at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader arrives after dismissing recent peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to claimed advances by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the key significance of this engagement is its very occurrence," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to something resembling routine global diplomacy."

For India, the risks are particularly elevated. The country faces a difficult international environment, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an assertive China.

This delicate balance was underscored just before the visit, when European ambassadors released a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's peace efforts. This prompted a firm response from Indian officials, who called it an unacceptable diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The historical partnership originates from the Cold War era and is firmly rooted, with Moscow long being Delhi's top defense supplier. This alliance was generally accepted by the West until a recent shift.

For years, Western nations ignored India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. However, recently stalled diplomacy, pressure mounted, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in US-India ties.

"Consequently, India has returned to its traditional posture of 'hedging'," explained a foreign policy expert. "It signals to the US that it has other choices and is waiting to see how the global dynamics settle."

Beyond international politics, India's fundamental concern with Russia is its strategic location. "China remains the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an excessively close bond between its adversary and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its military imports, shrinking its reliance on Russian equipment from a dominant share to under 40% in the past few years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but avoid so dependent that a sudden cutoff would leave it vulnerable," the analyst remarked.

Energy and Economic Ties

Enhanced trade relations is likely to be a major topic. The Russian leader has publicly stressed plans to take cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of crude oil imports remains pivotal. While the Indian government has vowed to continue buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have dampened activity from the private sector. At the same time, India has agreed to boost imports of American oil and gas.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "obstacles" in economic cooperation but said it would proceed without major disruption. The official minimized the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to circumvent them.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be addressed primarily through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader can speak to both sides, the nation lacks the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the conflict," the analyst said. "Beyond urging negotiations, its capacity to effect change is constrained."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the relationship is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," driven by national interest in a rapidly changing world.